Crazy Illusion
Kottke is mad over it, Andy is amazed by it. I am blown away by it. My eyes hurt everytime I see it. It's this amazing illusion that every blogger is linking to, on his site. So am I. Check it out.
Edward H. Adelson has created this Checker-Shadow Illusion. The squares A and B both have the same shade of grey. Can you believe that?!! To believe it, as everyone there did, I opened up the image in Gimp and checked the colours on the squares. They both are really the same!!

This is the explanation that Edward give for the illusion:
The visual system needs to determine the color of objects in the world. In this case the problem is to determine the gray shade of the checks on the floor. Just measuring the light coming from a surface (the luminance) is not enough: a cast shadow will dim a surface, so that a white surface in shadow may be reflecting less light than a black surface in full light. The visual system uses several tricks to determine where the shadows are and how to compensate for them, in order to determine the shade of gray "paint" that belongs to the surface.
The first trick is based on local contrast. In shadow or not, a check that is lighter than its neighboring checks is probably lighter than average, and vice versa. In the figure, the light check in shadow is surrounded by darker checks. Thus, even though the check is physically dark, it is light when compared to its neighbors. The dark checks outside the shadow, conversely, are surrounded by lighter checks, so they look dark by comparison.
A second trick is based on the fact that shadows often have soft edges, while paint boundaries (like the checks) often have sharp edges. The visual system tends to ignore gradual changes in light level, so that it can determine the color of the surfaces without being misled by shadows. In this figure, the shadow looks like a shadow, both because it is fuzzy and because the shadow casting object is visible.
The "paintness" of the checks is aided by the form of the "X-junctions" formed by 4 abutting checks. This type of junction is usually a signal that all the edges should be interpreted as changes in surface color rather than in terms of shadows or lighting.
As with many so-called illusions, this effect really demonstrates the success rather than the failure of the visual system. The visual system is not very good at being a physical light meter, but that is not its purpose. The important task is to break the image information down into meaningful components, and thereby perceive the nature of the objects in view.
To convince you, Andy has put up these static and animated proofs for the illusion.





4 comments have been added. Add your comments.
1. anand said...
neato :-)
2. Amit 'Netahoy' Agarwal said...
eah!!
3. badjag said...
Mind-blowing!
4. Kiruba Shankar said...
Amazing. Simply Amazing. Thanks for the info Nilesh.
Your Comments
* Please do not put off-topic comments. We reserve right to delete them at our discretion. You can post anonymously. If you are unable to see your posted comment immediately, it may have been queued for moderation. So do not submit it again. HTML formatting is allowed (only a, b, i, br, p, strong, em, ul, li & blockquote are allowed). Do not put paragraph tags. They are automatically inserted.